Translate

Friday, March 29, 2013

THE LEGAL SENSEI, TIME TO RECHARGE

  
The alternative to a vacation is to stay home and tip every 

third person you see.  ~Author Unknown 

A new Legal Sensei Post will be arriving in April. The Legal Sensei is tired, and will be taking a vacation on a cruise ship. Not so sure about it, but willing to give it a try. The idea of margarita(s) and lounge chairs somehow sounds really good to me right now. I am hoping that nothing happens like the post I wrote concerning the poo poo sloshing cruise from hell. I guess that would be bad Carnival karma for me.

With all of the events that have happened, for example, baby shootings, improper social media postings of insanely drunk young teenagers getting molested, etc. (be careful how much you drink and share on twitter), there will be a lot of topics waiting to be discussed.

We also have significant legal cases regarding gay marriage, federal benefits, sequestration, medicare cuts, insurance reform, threats from North Korea, the invasion of drones for non-military "observations" in our cities, potential radical changes in alimony laws, rejected plea deals for mass murderers--and the beat goes on and on. Again, as I always do, if there is a topic that you believe should be discussed, feel free to share it with me.

I hope that everybody has a healthy, safe, and happy holiday with their family.  Again, thanks for reading and sharing your thoughts and comments with me.

The Legal Sensei will be back in April.

~Leonardo G. Renaud

Friday, March 22, 2013

TRANSGENDER, DOES ONE BATHROOM FIT ALL?



There is no truth. There is only perception.



~Gustave Flaubert



I may have mentioned in prior posts that I enjoy writing about information that interests me, and hopefully others, because oftentimes the issues I discuss are not emphasized by mainstream media. Since I am not trying to market any particular service, I enjoy the freedom to discuss issues that may be controversial.


I absolutely promise that this post is going to cause some thought provoking discussion. I have already had heated discussions and opinions expressed at home, with my mom, and in my office, and I have not written anything thus far other than this introduction!!!

While skimming through the internet, I found a story about a transgender first-grader.  His name is Coy Mathis. He is six years old. I have to confess that I never knew that a child, at such a young age, could be a transgender person. In my mind, 6 year old children often have very creative minds, childhood quirks, and other developmental issues that cause them to have many different self-perceptions and doubts.  


Can a child believe that he is the opposite sex at the age of 6?


Although, I am somewhat skeptical about a 6 year first-grader being transgender, for the sake of argument, I will rely on the research and information obtained by Coy’s parents. I can only hope and believe that they would not raise a 6 year old child as a transgender person, if they were not 100% sure this is a legitimate fact.


According to Coy’s parents, they sought the assistance of support groups, conducted research, communicated with his pediatrician, and met with a child psychologist. According to all of their fact-finding, Coy’s parents are convinced that they must support Coy’s feelings that he is a girl. 
Quoting, Andrea Rael


Coy was born as a male; however, he identifies and presents himself as a girl. He has been attending Eagleside Elementary School in Fountain, Colorado since 2011.  According to Dan Frosch, Coy is allowed to wear girl’s clothing to school and is referred to as a female, as his parents have requested.



In January of 2013 the school told Coy’s parents that he could no longer use the girl’s bathroom. The school states that it has a bathroom available for Coy in the nurse’s bathroom, the boy’s bathroom, or a staff bathroom. The school’s position is that it has provided reasonable alternatives to Coy, and that there are no Colorado cases which require public schools to permit transgender students to use restrooms of the gender that they believe they are. 


Quoting Attorney W. Kelly Dude, legal counsel for the School District.


The school further believes that Coy’s parents are putting his demands regarding use of the girls’ restrooms over those children (or their parents) who are concerned about a boy using a girls’ bathroom.


For instance, high school students in Mississippi protested after a transgender classmate was permitted to wear women’s clothing. The students felt that their classmate was being given preferential treatment given the school district’s gender-specific dress code for them. 


Quoting, Dan Frosch


Moreover, the School District is concerned that Coy will obviously grow up into a young man, and his use of a girl’s bathroom may increase the girls’ concerns (and those of their parents) that an adolescent male is using the girl’s restroom. It arguably may not be a big deal for a 6 year old to be in a girls’ bathroom, but what about a 16 year old?


The options provided by Coy’s school were not acceptable to Coy’s parents, so they filed a complaint against the school district with the Colorado School District Civil Rights Division. Coy’s parents are attempting to get his school to change its stance. At the moment, Coy is being home schooled with his siblings. Coy’s parents say that they will not return their children to school until Coy is allowed to use the girls’ bathroom.


Quoting, Dan Frosch


Jill Filipovic, in strong defense of Coy’s position, indicates that in the 29 years of using women’s bathrooms, she has never once caught a glimpse of “anyone else’s bare crotch.”


However, this begs the question in my mind, what if a transgender girl who believes she is a male wants to use a male bathroom? Would it be comfortable for her male classmates, or even safe for her? Again, maybe not a big deal at 6 years old, but attitudes about sex can change dramatically as children become adolescents.


Michael D. Silverman, executive director of the Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund best summarizes the transgender position. He states in pertinent part:


“As we think about education around transgender issues at school, it’s important to remember how much relates to the core mission of schools.”


“In Coy’s case, for instance, [Coy’s] school has the opportunity to teach students a powerful lesson about respect, fair play, tolerance and treating others with kindness. That’s a lesson that all schoolchildren would benefit to learn.”


Colorado offers legal protections for transgender people. There are those who argue that those protections extend to schools, where the mundane rituals of going to the bathroom can be traumatic for transgender students.


Who knows what is right or wrong? There are logical arguments on both sides. Coy’s case is slowly unfolding into a major legal dispute that is going to test the question of whether Colorado’s anti-discrimination laws include the right of a 6 year male to use the girls’ bathroom---and will most likely lead to an avalanche of other cases to be filed depending on the outcome.


~Leonardo G. Renaud

Friday, March 15, 2013

IS YOUR “HOME SWEET HOME,” FLORIDA’S NEXT INSURANCE DISASTER?

“A man travels the world over in search of what he needs and returns home to find it.”
 George Augustus Moore



Jeff Bush was sleeping in his Florida home when his life literally came crashing down around him. The house he was in dropped into the earth. He was swallowed whole by the ground. His peaceful sleep quickly turned into what would be his last nightmare.



Jeff’s life ended in perhaps one of the most troubling ways imaginable.  Resting in the perceived safety of one’s home, and then dropping dozens of feet down into the earth in a pile of concrete, wood, and dirt. 



In a heroic attempt, Jeff’s brother jumped in the sinkhole to try to do anything he could to save his brother—all to no avail. Jeff’s brother’s effort nearly got him killed. His description of the gruesome scene included helplessly watching the bed frame and furniture disappear into the sinkhole, while he faintly heard his brother crying out for help as he was dying.



What caused this catastrophe? It turns out that Florida has an entire set of counties, known as “sinkhole alley” that have very high numbers of sinkholes and a higher risk of potential damages to homes. These areas have become severely devalued due to an onslaught of recent sinkhole litigation. People do not want to buy homes that are located in an “alley” of homes that can disappear into the earth.



At the same time, those who receive settlement money from insurers are taking their settlements and leaving. They have decided that the best plan is to take the money and run. They are not repairing the homes for which they receive settlement money from the insurance companies.  And, those who stick around cannot find buyers.



According to Citizens Property Insurance Corp., which insures more homeowners than any other company in Florida, the following counties are at high risk for sinkhole damage:

·                         Alachua

·                         Citrus

·                         Hamilton

·                         Hernando

·                         Hillsborough

·                         Lake

·                         Manatee

·                         Marion

·                       Pasco

·                       Pinellas

·                       Polk

·                       Seminole

·                       Sumter

·                       Suwannee

·                       Wakulla

·                       Washington





Citizens provides two different types of insurance coverage for sinkhole damage in Florida. One is coverage for Sinkhole Loss Coverage. The other is for Catastrophic Ground Cover Collapse. 



Sinkhole loss is defined in pertinent part “as structural damage to the building, including the foundation, caused by sinkhole activity.” “Sinkhole activity” means settlement or systematic weakening of the earth supporting such property only when such settlement or systematic weakening results from movement or raveling of soils, sediments, or rock materials into subterranean voids created by the effect of water on a limestone or similar rock formation.



Catastrophic Ground Cover Collapse is defined in pertinent part as:geological activity that results in all of the following: Abrupt collapse of the ground cover, a depression in the ground cover clearly visible to the naked eye, structural damage to the building, including the foundation, and, the insured structure being condemned and ordered to be vacated by the government agency authorized by law to issue such an order for that structure.”



What???



By reading the above “definitions,” it is easy to see why litigation is going to continue perpetually over whether coverage applies to claimed losses. What exactly is covered is anyone’s guess.



Sinkhole loss coverage has to be purchased separately from residential coverage. Catastrophic Ground Cover Collapse is automatically included in the base policy. Moreover, insurers are aggressively raising premium rates for sinkhole coverage as fast as I am typing this post.



Sinkhole damages are significant because they are causing numerous law suits to be filed against Citizens and other insurers. The average claim by Citizens based on the most recent records is nearly $90,000.00.  Aggressive marketing by private insurance adjusters also drives up costs by encouraging homeowners to file lawsuits. There have also been instances of illegal arrangements between engineers and contractors costing insurers hundreds of thousands of dollars by driving up potential claims.



As per Tampa Bay Times Journalist, Susan Taylor Martin, the most current figures show that Citizens took in $32 million in premiums and incurred $245 million in sinkhole losses.



Although there have been a lot of sinkhole claims, it is believed that Citizens’ drastically contributes to its own losses by opting to “fix” sinkhole repairs itself. The losses are driven up by shoddy work and excessively slow construction by companies hired by Citizens. Companies who are supposed to do construction work, and repair cosmetic damages, such as above the ground cracks, damages to walls, doors, floors, and windows----are routinely doing poor work.  This leads to additional claims by policyholders.

Quoting, Susan Taylor Martin.




Every time I hear about an incident involving an unusually tragic accident, I always think to myself, “there but for the grace of God go I.” The issues related to Jeff Bush’s story should be shared with others who—like me—never heard that this type of accident was even possible. Who knew that Florida was a place where people live daily on the verge of natural catastrophe aside from hurricanes?



~Leonardo G. Renaud

Friday, March 8, 2013

Anything You Can Do I Can Do Better


Anything you can do I can do better; I can do
 anything better than you.

Irving Berlin, composed for Broadway Musical Annie Get Your Gun

Don't underestimate a dangerous woman. And don't judge by appearances; evil can be pleasant and pretty on the outside. Just like poisoned candy.

-Joni E. Johnston, Psy.D.

Murder, sex, revenge, violence, greed, and brutality all fascinate us.

And, when these topics involve women, the public becomes ravenous in its mad search to find yet even more information about how and why these tragedies happen.

Don’t believe me? Turn on the television at any time, or read the newspaper, and you are guaranteed to find stories about women who had too much built up anger, who were twisted time bombs, or just plain evil. 

Our media landscape is scattered with these types of programs.

“Wives with Knives”
“Snapped”
“Deadly Women”

“Whether the motivation was revenge against a cheating husband, the promise of a hefty insurance payoff, or putting an end to years of abuse, the reasons are as varied as the women themselves. From socialites to secretaries, female killers share one thing in common: at some point, they all snapped.”

Snapped, Oxygen Media

The above are but a few of the extraordinarily popular reality television shows that exclusively focus on murderous women.

Like fatal car crashes, train wrecks, and fires, we just can’t bring ourselves to look away.

I confess. I am also enthralled with the Jodi Arias case. I have family and close friends, who all tell me that they watch the televised trial everyday because it is mesmerizing. They just can’t believe that somebody who looks like Jodi Arias could be capable of such brutal savagery. Put me on that list of people who also keep up with the courtroom drama.

If you have seen the news lately, you will generally know that Arias shot her boyfriend and stabbed him almost 30 times. This crime occurred in Arizona, which has the death penalty, and is what prosecutors are seeking as punishment for Arias.

Arias’ position is that that she had a strange sexual relationship with her boyfriend, she had a physical altercation with him, she defended herself, and then her memory is hazy regarding the murderous rampage she inflicted on her boyfriend. There are numerous questions that she has been asked by a very aggressive prosecutor concerning actions she took before and after the murder. She has been unclear and admittedly has many contradictions in her story.

Arias initially told authorities she had nothing to do with Alexander's death then blamed it on masked intruders before settling on self-defense. Her repeated stories to authorities, friends and family in the days after his death, and her efforts to create an alibi and avoid suspicion have been center stage throughout the weeks-long trial.


Arias also detailed for jurors how Alexander grew physically abusive in the months leading up to his death, once choking her into unconsciousness, and how he had sexual desires for young boys.

Arias was asked about past relationships with other men, how easily it would have been to get the gun from the victim's closet as they fought on the day of the killing, and why she worked to clean the crime scene.

Arias said she grabbed the gun from Alexander's closet during a fight at his house, and she was asked how she could have time to retrieve the gun while being chased.

"I just had the sense that he was chasing me," she said.

After killing Alexander, Arias took photos of his bloody corpse and then put the camera in a clothes washer. The jury asked her why she did that.

"I don't know why I would have done that," she said.


Interestingly, I hear comments that the prosecutor is being “too argumentative” in his cross-examination, which may not bode well for the goal of an execution. As a lawyer, there is always very fine line with cross-examination, appearance, and how it affects jurors.

As zealous advocates, lawyers want to get their point across, but do not want to overkill so much that potential points scored during cross-examination are diminished—or worse yet---the jury feels that the attorney is unnecessarily “beating up” on the witness, or repeating questions. This can make a big difference in any case, especially where prosecutors are seeking a death sentence.

Others are excited by the prosecutor, and feel that he is really “sticking it to” Arias by emphasizing her contradictions.

Watching Arias on the stand, it seems unbelievable that this meek, little, person could be capable of such savagery.

"Women are different in whom, how and why they kill," says James Alan Fox, a criminologist at Northeastern University. Though women committed roughly 10 percent of murders between 1976 and 2005, they were involved in nearly 35 percent of murders of intimate partners and nearly 30 percent of murders of where the victim was another family member, according to the Justice Department.

One consistent element, however, which is catnip for a ratings-desperate media, and often perverted public, is sex — and I’m not talking about gender. From Arias and Anthony to Aileen Wournos and the older case of Charlene Gallego, these were women not just accused of murder, but also with a graphic sexual component to all of their cases.

Arias’ testimony often sounded more like a hard core porno movie than a courtroom, as she claimed self-defense alleging (in her third account of what she says really happened) that she was sexually controlled by her now-dead boyfriend, Travis Alexander.

Before her acquittal, Casey Anthony’s sex life and demeanor after her daughter went missing became a focus for the prosecution and media alike.

Serial killer Aileen Wournos’ story is marked by incest, an early pregnancy at age 13, a marriage to a 70-year-old man, a lesbian tryst, and finally, work as a prostitute where she murdered her victims.

In the 1970s, Charlene Gallego was one half of the first known husband and wife serial killer duo, known in the news as the “sex slave killers” because they murdered ten victims, luring some of them into their van where they hog-tied, raped and killed them. 
Quoting, Dan Abrams

While statistics of murderous women differ, there are generally nine categories of women who kill. These are listed as follows:

Black Widow – systematically kills multiple spouses, partners, or other family members.
Team Killer – kills or participates in the killing of others in conjunction with at least one other.
Angel of Death – systematically kills people who are in her care for some form of medical attention
Question of Sanity – kills in apparent random manner and later judged to be insane.
Sexual Predator – systematically kills others in clear acts of sexual homicide.
Unexplained – kills for reasons that are totally inexplicable or for unclear motives.
Revenge – systematically kills out of hate or jealousy
Unsolved -a pattern of unsolved killings that may be attributed to a woman (or women)
Profit or Crime – systematically kills for profit or in course of committing another crime

Quoting, Michael & C. Kelleher (1998)


Says Dan Abrams, “A young, attractive woman accused of murder is interesting, in particular, because it’s rare and defies many societal expectations. This is not to justify the coverage, but rather to simply articulate the reality. They make good copy, great headlines, and often compelling television and even movies. However, let’s take care not to lay all the blame on the media. The media wouldn’t focus on female killers if it didn’t have a partner in crime, a public obsessed with evaluating, understanding and ultimately judging these women accused of the most heinous of crimes.”  

So, why are we unable to look away from the horrific murders committed by women?

It is perhaps best put by Carrie Gunter, “we're searching for that monster within the pretty exterior, hoping it's something that we'll eventually be able to identify. All of the childhood stories indicated evil as ugly, right? We never expect to see such ugliness/evil in a (outward appearing) beautiful person.”


-Leonardo G. Renaud

Friday, March 1, 2013

Run From The “Blade Runner”




“A sociopath is one who sees others as impersonal objects to be manipulated to fulfill their own narcissistic needs without any regard for the hurtful consequences of their selfish actions."


~R. Alan Woods

While I always attempt to keep an objective perspective in my posts, in my opinion based on all of the facts and information I have read about the death of Reeva Steenkamp, Oscar Pistorius is a murderer. His sense of self-entitlement and constant adulation from the public only stoked his tremendous ego and delirious concept of himself. He is a person who feels that he can do whatever he wants and get away with it. Can you say OJ Simpson? (at least OJ is now in prison for something) I hope, on behalf of the young lady he slaughtered, that the public does not continue to be enamored with him, and that he spend the rest of his miserable life in prison.

Let me tell you why I believe the above about the “Blade Runner.”

When I watched Oscar Pistorius run in these past Olympics, I was deeply moved by the fact that he had overcome so many obstacles in his life to reach his goals. Being a world class track star with no legs was simply amazing to me. The trials and tribulations he overcame in his life gave me such inspiration. Knowing that if a person really believes in themselves, and works hard towards a seemingly impossible goal, makes them a hero.  I was so proud and happy for him. By all accounts, all South Africans also considered him a hero and placed him on a towering pedestal, which glorifies everything that is good and pure about sports. The concept of overcoming overwhelming odds and reaching success is a story that deeply resonates with all of us.

I must admit, that when the story broke that his beautiful, educated girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp, had been killed in his home, I initially did not pay much attention to the media coverage. Since we are constantly blasted by news day and night, and in all different manners, I have been admittedly desensitized and rarely pay attention to the news. Like a lot of people, I assumed that some burglar broke into Pistorius’ house. Fearing for his safety, he fired shots to protect himself. Sadly, the person on the other side of the door was his girlfriend, and she was killed. It wasn’t until I started hearing arguments and heated discussions that I decided that I would take a closer look.

Facts About The Case

The pertinent facts are as follows:

Early on Valentine's Day morning, Oscar Pistorius, the double-amputee Olympian who is arguably South Africa's biggest sporting star, shot through a bathroom door at his home in Pretoria and killed his girlfriend, 29-year-old model and law school graduate Reeva Steenkamp.

Pistorius says he walked to the bathroom on his stumps, and then shot through the door. Investigators say the angle of the bullet holes suggest Pistorius was standing tall on his prosthetics. The police theory, they claim, gives credence to a charge of premeditation. If Pistorius had time to put on his prosthetics, they'll argue, then he wasn't getting out of bed quickly to pursue an intruder.

A front page article in The Times (of South Africa) quoted a police officer who said he had contact with Pistorius after Wednesday's hearings. "He's convinced he'll be out by the weekend and back on the track before the end of the year," the officer said. Would an innocent man be that confident? Could a guilty man be that delusional? If that quote is accurate, psychologists could have a field day dissecting it.

Police found two boxes of testosterone, syringes and needles in a bedroom cabinet. Later, a police spokesman admitted the contents of the box were unknown. Testosterone is a banned substance by the IOC. The defense says the boxes contained an herbal remedy commonly used for sexual enhancement purposes. Pistorius is 26 years old.

Pistorius has argued in court that he was closing his balcony doors Feb. 14 when he heard a noise from the bathroom. Fearing an intruder, and without his prosthetic legs on, he grabbed a gun from under his bed and fired through the closed bathroom door, he told the court.

But prosecutors say that's implausible, arguing that the gun's holster was found under the side of the bed where Steenkamp was sleeping, and that Pistorius would have seen she wasn't there.

Prosecutors argue that Pistorius, a double-amputee, took the time to put on his carbon-fiber prosthetic legs and walk to the bathroom, where he fired the gun, hitting Steenkamp three times. Their insistence that Pistorius took a moment to put the legs on indicates that he thought out and planned to kill Steenkamp.

There was a "deliberate aiming of shots at the toilet from about 1.5 meters [about 5 feet]," prosecutor Gerrie Nel said.

They also say the angle at which the shots were fired shows that Pistorius was already wearing his prosthetics when he fired.

"[The angle] seems to me down. Fired down," officers told the court Feb. 20, suggesting that Pistorius was standing high up on his artificial legs.

Pistorius says he did not put on the prosthetics, and was on his stumps, and felt vulnerable when he shot through the bathroom door.

Police said no calls to the police or ambulance service were made on any of the four cell phones -- two iPhones and two BlackBerrys -- found in the bathroom and bedroom of Pistorius' home. Investigators said that guards at the gated estate called Pistorius, who told them he was "all right." The call was not disconnected and they could hear him crying, police said.

Pistorius says he called the manager of the housing estate, and asked him to place a call for an ambulance. He says that he also called a private paramedic service. According to his lawyers, there was a fifth phone that Pistorius used to make the calls.

There had been previous incidents at his house involving allegations of domestic violence.

My thoughts regarding the above information is, if he knew that his girlfriend was sleeping at his house, why would he not confirm it was her by yelling her name out loud, or asking if it was her through the bathroom door?  After all, he was armed with a gun.

Why did he shoot four bullets through a bathroom door---without having a clue where his girlfriend was located in the house? Also, why would he not immediately call the police or an ambulance after finding his girlfriend shot to death? Why were all of the shots perfectly aimed at the upper body and head?

Finally, if he did have his prosthetics on, which he does not sleep with, why would he take the trouble to put them on if he truly thought there was an intruder in the house? It takes time to put prosthetics on, and by all accounts he can easily move without them.

The savage shooting that occurred in this case, prompted a long conversation with my wife wherein we discussed how many women are either abused or killed by spouses or significant others.  I think the following statistics are going to shock you, the way they did to us. We had absolutely no idea of the following:

According to domesticviolencestatistics.org,
  • Every 9 seconds in the US a woman is assaulted or beaten.
  • Around the world, at least one in every three women has been beaten, coerced into sex or otherwise abused during her lifetime. Most often, the abuser is a member of her own family.
  • Domestic violence is the leading cause of injury to women—more than car accidents, muggings, and rapes combined.
  • Studies suggest that up to 10 million children witness some form of domestic violence annually.
  • Nearly 1 in 5 teenage girls who have been in a relationship said a boyfriend threatened violence or self-harm if presented with a breakup.
  • Everyday in the US, more than three women are murdered by their husbands or boyfriends.
  • Ninety-two percent of women surveyed listed reducing domestic violence and sexual assault as their top concern.
  • Domestic violence victims lose nearly 8 million days of paid work per year in the US alone—the equivalent of 32,000 full-time jobs.
  • Based on reports from 10 countries, between 55 percent and 95 percent of women who had been physically abused by their partners had never contacted non-governmental organizations, shelters, or the police for help.
  • The costs of intimate partner violence in the US alone exceed $5.8 billion per year: $4.1 billion are for direct medical and health care services, while productivity losses account for nearly $1.8 billion.
  • Men who as children witnessed their parents’ domestic violence were twice as likely to abuse their own wives than sons of nonviolent parents.
  • In a 1995-1996 study conducted in the 50 States and the District of Columbia, nearly 25% of women and 7.6% of men were raped and/or physically assaulted by a current or former spouse, cohabiting partner, or dating partner/acquaintance at some time in their lifetime (based on survey of 16,000 participants, equally male and female).
Patricia Tjaden & Nancy Thoennes, U.S. Dep't of Just., NCJ 181867, Extent, Nature, and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence, at iii (2000), available at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/pubs-sum/181867.htm
  • Approximately 1.3 million women and 835,000 men are physically assaulted by an intimate partner annually in the United States.
Patricia Tjaden & Nancy Thoennes, U.S. Dep't of Just., NCJ 183781, Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey, at iv (2000), available at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/pubs-sum/183781.htm

Traits of Professional Athletes

As I continued to hear about the shocking statistics of domestic violence and murders, I decided to also learn more about Pistorius. I wanted to learn more about the man, whom I had greatly admired, along with all of South Africa. I also wanted to examine whether his status as an elite athlete may have impacted his actions on the night that his girlfriend was killed.

There are 12 predominant traits of an abuser. These are as follows: 1)Charming; 2)Jealous; 3) Manipulative; 4) Controlling; 5) Claim to be a Victim; 6) Narcissistic; 7) Inconsistent; 8) Critical; 9) Disconnected; 10) Hypersensitive; 11) Vicious and Cruel; 12) Insincerely Repentant. 

Quoting, Laura Petherbridge, 12 Traits of an Abuser.

There is no question that elite athletes are narcissistic men. They have to be because anybody in the pursuit of greatness are people whom the ends always justify the means. The problem with the mythologizing of professional athletes, is the notion that they stand for something special beyond the field of play. They don’t, but that doesn’t stop us from trying to make them equal to the image we insist on having for them. This often affects their personal decisions wherein they believe that they are above the rest of us and deserve to get and do whatever they want. There is selfish entitlement that comes with nonsensical idolatry that seals them in an airtight bubble regardless of their feigned ability to act humble in post game interviews.

Pistorius also liked adrenaline rushes. He liked to drive cars 155 miles per hour on wet roads, crashed his speed boat requiring 172 stitches, had a huge interest in guns and shooting, and kept dangerous animals as pets.

Quoting, Buzz Bissinger., The Unwarranted Mythology of Oscar Pistorius.

According to uk.eurosport.yahoo.com, Pistorius was accused in 2012 of threatening to cause bodily violence against another man whom he accused of cheating with his girlfriend. The man who Pistorius threatened stated that the girl at the center of the controversy was not even Pistorius’ girlfriend, and admitted that he was “scared for his life.” A charge of defamation was also brought against Pistorius. As it stands, both men have made conflicting accusations against each other.

Oscar Pistorius subjected Reeva Steenkamp to such intense emotional pressure in the early days of the relationship that her best friend's father was forced to warm him to "back off". 

Cecil Myers, who Miss Steenkamp lived with in Johannesburg said he had found Pistorius to be "very moody" as he wooed the young model who felt caged in by his attentions. 

"Very nice and charming to us when they started dating. Then he always came in to say hello. But when they began to date steadily, he just dropped her and picked her up. 

"That's not right. I call it respect. If you're in a relationship and you pick up the 'daughter' in the house, at least come in and say hello." After the couple's first date, Pistorius "would not leave her alone," Mr. Myers said. 

"He kept pestering her, phoning and phoning and phoning her. Oscar was hasty and impatient and very moody – that's my impression of him.

"She told me he pushed her a bit into a corner. She felt caged in.”

"She was my little girl, and he shot her four times from behind a closed door,” Mr. Myers said.

Miss Steenkamp had lived with Mr. Myers, a commercial printer, and his wife Desi since September, and the couple's daughter Kim was the model's closest friend in the city. 

People will stay away from him now. Women too, they will be too afraid, no girl wants to risk being killed. And if my daughter wanted to go out with him, the shi[_]would hit the proverbial fan. Mr. Myers said he had decided to talk to the newspaper because, "everywhere you go, it's just Oscar, Oscar". 

"Reeva was the victim, her voice must be heard too. People must know who Reeva Steenkamp was," he said. 

Miss Steenkamp did not originally plan to stay with Oscar Pistorius the night she died but changed her mind because it became too late for her to drive home safely, her best friend's father has said. 

Miss Steenkamp, who grew up in Port Elizabeth, used to introduce him to her friends as her "Joburg dad". 

"I've got this thing with all three children (Reeva, and his daughters, Kim and Gina), if they don't come home at night, they must text me," Mr. Myers told South Africa's City Press newspaper. 

"Then Reeva sent the (SMS) message: 'Hi guys, I'm too tired. It's too far to drive. I'm sleeping at Oscar's tonight. See you tomorrow'. 

"Tomorrow never dawned for her I have nightmares at night thinking how frightened she must have been. Can you imagine how terrified she was?" 

Quoting, Mike Pflanz

Conclusion

I know they teach you in law school that a person’s guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, etc. But, often when you walk into a courthouse, the lawyers will tell you that you follow the law, but you do not leave your common sense outside the courtroom door. 

Given the overwhelming facts that have been provided, there is absolutely no question in my mind that this animal killed Reeva Steenkamp. She unfortunately crossed paths with a homicidal killer. One can only hope that the fascination with Pestorius’ story and legend does not outweigh the terror that abruptly ended a young girl’s life. While he showed that he did accomplish greatness in sport, this does not transcend all of the facts that show, in the end, he is just another plain killer.

Will celebrity outweigh tragedy? Keeping my fingers crossed it doesn’t.


~Leonardo G. Renaud